Zum Hauptinhalt springen Zur Suche springen Zur Hauptnavigation springen
Haben Sie Fragen? Einfach anrufen, wir helfen gerne: Tel. 089/210233-0
oder besuchen Sie unser Ladengeschäft in der Pacellistraße 5 (Maxburg) 80333 München
+++ Versandkostenfreie Lieferung innerhalb Deutschlands
Haben Sie Fragen? Tel. 089/210233-0

Stanton v. Armstrong

78,50 €*

Versandkostenfrei

Produktnummer: 16A35808574
Autor: Boals, Elizabeth I Sharma, Shailee D
Themengebiete: Legal Reference / Law Profession
Veröffentlichungsdatum: 01.01.2016
EAN: 9781601565815
Sprache: Englisch
Seitenzahl: 133
Produktart: Kartoniert / Broschiert
Verlag: Aspen Publishing
Untertitel: Case File
Produktinformationen "Stanton v. Armstrong"
Stanton v. Armstrong is a civil action for defamation and tortious interference with contract with the extra glamor of a beauty pageant. Harper Stanton brought the action against Toby Armstrong in the United States District Court, District of Nita, for an allegedly defamatory statement claiming Stanton had taken a bribe to fix the Miss Olympia beauty pageant. Armstrong posted this statement on the Pageant Tips Blog. At the time of the blog post, Stanton was the Chief Executive Officer of Miss Olympia, Inc. and Armstrong was a blogger and the owner of a pageant contestant coaching company. Many facilities and technology malfunctions impacted the quality of the Miss Olympia Pageant that year: lighting and sound problems; a missing judge; changes in the scoring method. After the disastrous pageant, Miss Olympia, Inc. fired Stanton. Were Armstrong's unfounded claims the basis for Stanton's firing? Was Stanton legitimately fired for being a dishonest CEO manipulating the pageant from behind the scenes? Or was Stanton fired for tarnishing the Miss Olympia Pageant through no fault of his own? Stanton v. Armstrong is a civil action for defamation and tortious interference with contract with the extra glamor of a beauty pageant. Harper Stanton brought the action against Toby Armstrong in the United States District Court, District of Nita, for an allegedly defamatory statement claiming Stanton had taken a bribe to fix the Miss Olympia beauty pageant. Armstrong posted this statement on the Pageant Tips Blog. At the time of the blog post, Stanton was the Chief Executive Officer of Miss Olympia, Inc. and Armstrong was a blogger and the owner of a pageant contestant coaching company. Many facilities and technology malfunctions impacted the quality of the Miss Olympia Pageant that year: lighting and sound problems; a missing judge; changes in the scoring method. After the disastrous pageant, Miss Olympia, Inc. fired Stanton. Were Armstrong's unfounded claims the basis for Stanton's firing? Was Stanton legitimately fired for being a dishonest CEO manipulating the pageant from behind the scenes? Or was Stanton fired for tarnishing the Miss Olympia Pageant through no fault of his own? This entertaining case file supports all the alleged intrigue with exhibits that include blog posts, a Twitter account, and a YouTube video, all hosted on "microsites" specifically created for use in trial. Scoring sheets and pageant guidelines, photographs, room sketches, and more provide a wealth of information for students to analyze when deciding what to pursue in both depositions and the full trial.
Bücherregal gefüllt mit juristischen Werken

Sie möchten lieber vor Ort einkaufen?

Sie haben Fragen zu diesem oder anderen Produkten oder möchten einfach gerne analog im Laden stöbern? Wir sind gerne für Sie da und beraten Sie auch telefonisch.

Juristische Fachbuchhandlung
Georg Blendl

Parcellistraße 5 (Maxburg)
8033 München

Montag - Freitag: 8:15 -18 Uhr
Samstags geschlossen