Beyond Contempt

'A must read for anyone who wants to understand not only our media, but power in Britain' - Owen Jones, author of The Establishment What really happened in Court 12 at the Old Bailey - when the world's most powerful tabloid empire finally faced the law? When the News of the World collapsed in disgrace and the phone hacking scandal exploded across Britain, the headlines were loud, the leaks were selective, and the truth was buried under spin. Then came the phone hacking trial: 130 days of evidence, legal trench warfare, and an unprecedented battle between corporate money and public justice. In Beyond Contempt, writer and journalist Peter Jukes takes you behind the courtroom doors to reveal the story you could not read at the time. Because during a live criminal trial, strict contempt of court rules mean the most explosive arguments, documents, and backstage manoeuvres are often legally unreportable - until the verdict. This is not a recycled recap of what you already saw on the news. It's the inside story of what was happening when the cameras weren't there: the embargoed legal submissions, the arguments held in the jury's absence, the tactical delays and surprise disclosures, and the constant, nail-biting tension between open justice and the right to a fair trial. Jukes was there day after day, live-reporting the proceedings as they unfolded, and he turns that frontline perspective into a gripping narrative that reads like a political thriller - but is anchored in the realities of British justice, press power, and modern surveillance. From the hacking of celebrities and politicians to the targeting of the missing schoolgirl Milly Dowler, from the Royal Family to Downing Street, the trial exposed how far a newspaper would go to get a story - and how hard it is for the law to catch up. You'll step into the Old Bailey as senior News International figures - including Rebekah Brooks and Andy Coulson- fight charges linked to phone hacking, bribery allegations, and alleged attempts to conceal evidence. You'll see why this courtroom battle rippled through policing, Parliament, and public trust-and why the judge warned that "not only the defendants are on trial... British justice is on trial."